EU Passes Oppressive Copyright Rules That Could Ruin the Web

Illustration image of the

EU Passes Oppressive Copyright Rules That Could Ruin the Web

Article 13 will require certain companies - such as YouTube and Facebook - to stop users from sharing copyrighted material, without a proper licence.

However, the reform has been watered down from original proposals.

Jean, a former member of American hip-hop group The Fugees, stands on one side of a fractious debate over internet freedom that has pitched artists and musicians against tech giants and internet activists.

"[It] takes an unprecedented step towards the transformation of the internet from an open platform for sharing and innovation, into a tool for the automated surveillance and control of its users", web inventor Tim Berners-Lee and Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales warned in a June letter to a top European Union official.

The legislation still faces a final vote in January 2019, and individual member states will then have to implement their version of it. The first, Article 11, will require tech companies to pay publishers when their content appears on services such as Google News.

Dairy consumption may not lead to higher risk of cardiovascular disease
The findings would not be so controversial and surprising if they didn't go completely against conventional dietary advice. Rangan of the University of Sydney wrote consumers don't need to necessarily change their consumption.

Time almost up: Fierce Hurricane Florence aims at Southeast - Story | WFLD
Despite its unpredictable path, it was forecast to make landfall near Cape Fear, North Carolina, at midday on Friday . There will be hurricane-force winds up to 80 miles from the centre of the storm, meteorologists say.

On Puerto Rico, Trump Is Right
But that toll should have at least another 1,000 added to it because that's the number of people who died due to debris exposure. Those involved with the study have emphasized that the 3,00 estimate is not a conclusive number and further work should be done.

"The European Parliament has introduced the censorship of content of Internet users. We are in favor of a rules-based, multilateral approach and of settling the differences through the WTO, therefore the rule of law has to be accepted, and not the right of might", said worldwide trade committee rapporteur Bernd Lange (Socialists & Democrats, Germany). "Not allowing creators to make a living from their work is the real threat to everyone's digital creativity", they claimed in a blog post. The proposals had been rejected in a vote in July and sent back to the European Commission to be amended.

The problem? Publishers who can afford to charge news aggregators like Facebook and Google lower rates will thrive. And upload filters risk creating uncertainty for users and companies alike. Expect the web to change. But you don´t do it in a way that could kill innovation and limit consumer choice. The tweaks to the proposals that managed to push it through the European Parliament are just that - tweaks.

However, his colleague, Sajjad Karim, said, "Copyright law is at last catching up with the digital age".

"This legislation is now better balanced, answering numerous concerns of journalists, publishers and musicians whose work was being shared freely online without stifling innovation or fundamentally changing the nature of the internet", Sajjad Karim, Conservative legal affairs spokesman, said.

These closed-door discussions, which also include the European Commission, are known in EU jargon as "trilogues".

Latest News